home


























 

Claudio Cappuccino

Testi originali Giugno 2000

Sat, 03 Jun 2000
San Diego Union Tribune (CA)
http://www.uniontrib.com/

U.S. DRUG CZAR SAYS STATE INITIATIVE WOULD WEAKEN DRUG COURTS' POWER
by Jessie Seyfer, Associated Press

McCaffrey says law would take away ability to punish

SAN FRANCISCO -- Barry McCaffrey, the nation's drug czar, is urging Californians to reject a new ballot measure that he says would strip the state's drug courts of their power.
Speaking yesterday before the National Association of Drug Court Professionals, McCaffrey said the initiative would be damaging because it would eliminate drug testing and take away drug courts' ability to punish offenders who do not comply with treatment.
"If you think you can treat drug addicts without holding them accountable, you obviously don't understand the nature of the addiction brain disease," McCaffrey said.
The nation's drug policy director said the initiative also would undermine the drug courts, which he supports. Drug courts allow non-violent offenders to avoid jail and proceed through rehabilitation with regular drug tests and check-ins with judges.
Hundreds of drug courts have arisen across the country in the last 10 years, with 101 in California alone.
"We're on the verge of having a poison pill inserted into the revolution," McCaffrey said. "I hope California, with its trend-setting ideas, will not let drug courts be dismantled from within."
Proponents of the initiative, the Drug Treatment Diversion Program Act, say critics have been grossly misinformed. Dave Fratello, a spokesman for the measure, said the initiative was meant to enhance, not eliminate, drug courts.
Fratello, who represents the sponsoring organization, the Campaign for New Drug Policies, said the only changes the measure would prompt would be to increase drug treatment spending to $120 million per year and to send non-violent first and second-time drug offenders automatically into treatment.
In current drug courts, prosecutors determine which offenders are eligible for treatment.
The measure is backed by billionaire George Soros, who also funded California's controversial Proposition 215, legalizing marijuana for medical use.
Supporters of the measure also disputed claims that it eliminates drug testing, and robs judges of their ability to send offenders to jail.
"Judges may set any range of conditions . . . for drug offenders processed under the initiative. Such conditions may include daily, weekly or monthly court appearances, in addition to drug testing," said a written statement issued yesterday by the Campaign for New Drug Policies.
"Upon any violation of any condition . . . the court may drop the offender out of the initiative's system and incarcerate that person for up to 16 months."
Fratello pointed out the attorney general found the initiative would save the state between $100 million and $150 million annually because of lowered prison costs.
Campaigners gathered more than 700,000 signatures to qualify the initiative for the November ballot, far more than the 419,260 required.

•••

Sat, 03 Jun 2000
San Francisco Examiner
http://www.examiner.com/

DRUG CZAR BLASTS NO-JAIL PROPOSAL
by Michael Dougan

State referendum puts treatment before prison for some offenders

White House drug czar Barry McCaffrey has condemned a California referendum that would keep nonviolent first-time drug offenders out of jail.
McCaffrey - who has publicly opposed mandatory sentencing minimums and three-strikes laws - told a gathering of 3,000 drug court professionals that the so-called Campaign for New Drug Policies measure is a "poison pill" that can destroy effective anti-addiction programs recently initiated
throughout the state.
McCaffrey made his remarks Friday at a conference of the National Association of Drug Court Professionals in downtown San Francisco.
McCaffrey has publicly championed drug courts, a relatively recent innovation in which drug offenders are given treatment and counseling options over incarceration. They can be sentenced to jail if they do not abide by the rules.
The drug court system began with 12 courts nationwide in 1994. Currently, there are more than 600 courts in the United States and five foreign nations. In California, there are 101 drug courts.
The well-funded referendum, to appear on the California ballot in November, would mandate that people convicted of nonviolent drug offenses, including those on parole, be sent to treatment facilities instead of jail. Then their offense could be erased from the record.
McCaffrey said the threat of jail time sometimes is necessary to inspire hard-core addicts to change their ways.
"If you think you can deal with changing drug addicts without holding them accountable for their behavior, you don't understand the nature of this brain disease," he said. "You have to have a reward and a punishment for people whose chaotic lives are completely out of control."
McCaffrey called for greater coordination between various service agencies - including Medicaid and drug treatment programs - and drug courts. He also urged the development of re-entry drug courts to work with prison parolees.
Following his remarks, McCaffrey spoke in an interview against mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses and laws that can put drug offenders in prison for extremely lengthy sentences.
Judges should retain authority to decide sentences in these cases, he said.
"We still have inadequately educated, in my view, state and federal legislators." Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Stephen Manley said supporters of the anti-jail proposition on California's November ballot "suggest ... that drug courts do not work, that supervision is not necessary."
In fact, he said, drug courts "send addicts back to the community as better people with jobs. ... We have demonstrated in California that drug courts work."
He said state legislators who support the drug court system have drafted a bill to counter the pending ballot measure. It would require the Superior Court in each county to develop its own drug court, and remove mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug offenses, he said.
Jeffrey Tauber, a Virginia judge and president of the drug court
organization, said that drug courts represent a radical reform in treating addicts.
Tauber said a study conducted by Columbia University has demonstrated that addicts brought before drug courts have much greater chances of recovery than those simply sent to treatment programs.
"Coercion works," he said. "There's all kinds of coercion."
He said drug courts practice "therapeutic jurisprudence ... It's not about punishment for the sake of punishment."

•••

Sun, 21 May 2000
Denver Post (CO)
http://www.denverpost.com/

FIGHTING DRUGS IS A MATTER OF FAITH
by Barry McCaffrey, director of the Office of National Drug Control
Policy.

Each week, millions of Americans attend religious services to seek guidance, reaffirm moral values, offer charity and obtain a sense of community. Each of these four elements underscores the importance of faith-based organizations in the fight against drugs. Educating young people to reject drugs requires us to guide them and teach them values.
Helping someone addicted to drugs reclaim his life is one of the greatest gifts of charity you can offer. America's drug problem is made up of a series of local epidemics, only by working together within our communities can we defeat this problem.

On May 10, I traveled to Colorado Springs to stand with Dr. James Dobson and the Young Life Christian Ministry. The ministry's youth programs are model efforts for how faith-based organizations can play a critical role in helping our young people choose the right path and remain drug-free.
Dobson's Focus on the Family message is also central to reducing youth drug use. Parents and families are among the most vital protective factors in safeguarding the futures of our children. Studies show that getting involved in the lives of your children - such as regularly attending religious services and eating dinner together - substantially reduces the risks of drug use.

The One Way 2 Play program of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes is another example of how faith groups help young people stay drug-free. The One Way 2 Play program uses sports to teach the importance of staying drug-free as part of a healthy lifestyle and a commitment to faith. This summer, 20,000 young people from coast to coast will participate in
fellowship's youth camps, which provide a positive summer experience and promote the One Way 2 Play message. The fellowship has run these camps since 1956, when the first camp opened in Estes Park. The fellowship's pro athlete teammates also provide young people with positive role models - Coach Troy Dungy of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers will take his coaching staff to a local fellowship camp this year.

In addition to preventing drug use, faith-based organizations also play a critical role in helping those already addicted to drugs. For example, in Washington, D.C., the Gospel Rescue Ministry has helped homeless men offering pastoral support as part of a therapeutic drug treatment program.
With federal support, the ministry recently opened the Fulton House of Hope to help female addicts. The Salvation Army, which runs flagship drug treatment programs nationwide, is also one of the nation's largest faith-based charities. Helping someone break free of the chains of addiction and return to being a productive member of the community is a gift of life.

In many drug-blighted areas, the local church, mosque or synagogue is the only institution upon which to rebuild a community. For example, in 1988, the leaders of the Al-Taqua Mosque in Brooklyn, N.Y., decided that the time had come to take back their neighborhood from crack dealers. Working with
their local police, the mosque organized community patrols and helped coordinate police sweeps. The dealers are now long gone, leaving behind a stronger relationship between the community and the local police.

The light at the end of the tunnel, however, remains a distance away. In some areas of the country, gang members still pray to the saints to protect them as they fight over drug territories, never once understanding just how far they have strayed from the course of good. America's faith community has one of the nation's strongest pulpits from which to empower people to
reject drugs. As British Theologian Dean William Inge said: "If we are to safeguard our children and communities, rabbis, priests, clerics, deacons, sisters, brothers and cantors must help lead the way.

While our religions differ in some ways, our shared faith provides a common ground that reaches across denominations. For all of us remaining drug free is a matter of faith - faith in ourselves, faith in our families and faith in our values.

Torna a Giugno•Accedi all'archivio