Dal sito di Canadians for Safe Access
http://safeaccess.ca/research/acmd.htm
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K.,
2002
The Classification of Cannabis
Under the Misuse of Dugs Act 1971
Commissioned by the British Home Office in October of 2001.
Submitted in March, 2002.
Il
testo completo (pdf)
Cannabis Arrests:
The number of cannabis offences (as persons found guilty,
cautioned, given a fiscal offence, or dealt with by compounding)
rose from 15,388 in 1981 to 99,140 in 1998 before falling to
88,548 in 1999. Over 90 per cent of such recorded cannabis offences
in 1999 were for ‘unlawful possession’. Offences
related to heroin and amphetamines in 1999 were 12,760 and 12,102
(respectively). (P.5, para. 3.6, Advisory Council on the Misuse
of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Addiction:
No individuals are reported to the Northern Ireland Addicts
Index as having problematic cannabis use. (P.5 para. 3.8, Advisory
Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Fertility:
The effects of cannabis on fertility, however, are unclear.
(P.6, para. 4.3.4, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs,
U.K., 2002)
Criminality/Risk-Taking Behaviour/Violence:
Cannabis differs from alcohol, however, in one major respect:
it seems not to increase risk-taking behaviour. This may explain
why it appears to play a smaller role than alcohol in road traffic
accidents. Cannabis intoxication tends to produce relaxation
and social withdrawal rather than the aggressive and disinhibited
behaviour commonly found under the influence of alcohol. This
means that cannabis rarely contributes to violence either to
others or to oneself, whereas alcohol use is a major factor
in deliberate self-harm, domestic accidents and violence. (P.7,
para.4.3.6, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
As discussed in paragraph 4.3.6, cannabis use
does not commonly produce the mental states leading to violence
to others; but the illegal market does contribute to violence
in some parts of our cities. (P.10, para. 4.7.1, Advisory Council
on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Anxiety:
Acute cannabis intoxication can also lead to panic
attacks, paranoia and confused feelings that drive users to
seek medical help. These effects are generally short lived and
usually respond to reassurance or a minor tranquilliser. (P.7,
para. 4.3.7, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K.,
2002)
Cancer/Health:
Indeed, smoking cannabis may be more dangerous than tobacco
since it has a higher concentration of certain carcinogens.
However, there are factors with smoked cannabis that may mitigate
this risk. In general cannabis users smoke fewer cigarettes
per day than tobacco smokers and most give up in their 30s,
so limiting the long-term exposure that we now know is the critical
factor in cigarette-induced lung cancer. (P.7, para.4.4.1, Advisory
Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Preliminary studies of lung function in regular
cannabis smokers have not found a major cause for concern in
the majority, but some severe cases of lung damage have been
reported in young very heavy users. (P.7, para. 4.4.2, Advisory
Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
The occasional use of cannabis is only rarely
associated with significant problems in otherwise healthy individuals.
Impaired psychomotor performance and, uncommonly, acute psychotic
states are the most important. They are, however, self-limiting
and (usually) readily managed. These harmful effects of cannabis,
however, are very substantially less than those associated with
similar use of other drugs, such as amphetamines, which (like
cannabis) are currently classified as Class B. (P.11, para.
5.2, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Cardiovascular:
Cannabis also produces an increase in heart rate. Maximum increases
in heart rate occur within 15 to 30 minutes of inhalation, and
remain raised for two hours or more. Tolerance to the cardiovascular
effects of cannabis occurs with repeated use. (P.6, para. 4.3.1,
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
The cardiovascular actions of cannabis are similar
to the effects of exercise, and probably do not constitute a
significant risk in healthy adolescents and young adults. (P.6,
para. 4.3.3, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K.,
2002)
Cannabis has been reported to produce modest bronchodilator
effects (opening of the airways) but can worsen asthma. (P.6,
para.4.3.4, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Unlike sedative intoxicants such as alcohol, cannabis
does not cause respiratory depression or suppress the gag reflex
even when extremely intoxicated. Moreover, the fact that cannabis
is usually smoked means that the effects are almost immediate
and once inhalation stops they begin to subside. (P.6-7, para.
4.3.5, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Addiction/Dependence:
It is possible to rank the risks of dependence of abused drugs
with heroin and crack cocaine the worst and cannabis generally
at, or near, the bottom (and well below nicotine and alcohol).
Nevertheless, repeated cannabis use does lead to a significant
proportion of regular users becoming dependent although the
severity of their dependence is generally not such as to lead
to criminal behaviour. (P.8, para. 4.4.5, Advisory Council on
the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
The epidemiological evidence demonstrates that
cannabis use, especially amongst adolescents and young adults,
is substantial. The apparent and ready availability of cannabis
is, however, disproportionate to the relatively small numbers
of people seeking help from drug treatment agencies for cannabis
misuse. The high use of cannabis is not associated with major
health problems for the individual or society. (P.11, para.
5.1, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Regular heavy use of cannabis can result in dependence,
but its dependence potential is substantially less than that
of other Class B drugs such as amphetamines or, indeed, that
of tobacco or alcohol. (P.11, para. 5.4, Advisory Council on
the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Mental Illness:
The other main concern about the chronic use of cannabis is
whether it can lead to mental illness (especially schizophrenia).
Although debated for well over a century, no clear causal link
has been demonstrated. (P.8, para. 4.4.6, Advisory Council on
the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Brain Damage:
There is no evidence that cannabis causes structural brain damage
in man. Neither radiological studies nor post mortem examinations
have revealed atrophy or other causes for concern. (P.8, para.
4.4.8, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Pregnancy:
Tobacco smoking and alcohol use are significant causes of harm
to the unborn child. A small proportion of women use cannabis
during pregnancy and the birth weights of their babies are lower
than expected. This is probably due to the effects of carbon
monoxide in the smoke of cannabis cigarettes as similar findings
are well established for tobacco smoking in pregnancy. (P.9,
para. 4.5.1, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K.,
2002)
Taken together this data suggest that cannabis
use in pregnancy is not safe but that it is probably no more
dangerous to the foetus than either alcohol or tobacco. Pregnant
women should continue to be warned to avoid all these substances.
(P.9, para. 4.5.3, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs,
U.K., 2002)
Gateway Theory:
Even if the gateway theory is correct, it cannot be a particularly
wide gate as the majority of cannabis users never move on to
Class A drugs. (P.9, para. 4.6.2, Advisory Council on the Misuse
of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Interestingly, other studies have found that the
use of alcohol and tobacco in early teens (and especially in
pre-adolescents) appears to be associated with the later use
of many drugs including cannabis. In all these studies there
is a distinct possibility that the driving factor in the misuse
of drugs is the personality and/or peer group of the subject
rather than the drug itself. (P.9, para. 4.6.3, Advisory Council
on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002) It is not possible to state,
with certainty, whether or not cannabis use predisposes to dependence
on Class A drugs such as heroin or crack cocaine. Nevertheless
the risks (if any) are small and less than those associated
with the use of tobacco or alcohol. (P.11, para.5.5, Advisory
Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Cannabis and Driving: Cannabis appears not to
make as major a contribution to road traffic or other accidents
as alcohol. (P.10, para. 4.7.1, Advisory Council on the Misuse
of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
HIV/AIDS Transmission: Injecting a drug is one
of the most important causes of the spread of blood borne infections
such as HIV or hepatitis. Unlike many drugs (opiates, stimulants,
benzodiazepines and barbiturates) cannabis is not used by injection
and so is free of these risks. (P.10, para. 4.7.2, Advisory
Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
Conclusion:
Cannabis, however, is less harmful than other substances
(amphetamines, barbiturates, codeine-like compounds) within
Class B of Schedule 2 to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. The continuing
juxtaposition of cannabis with these more harmful Class B drugs
erroneously (and dangerously) suggests that their harmful effects
are equivalent. This may lead to the belief, amongst cannabis
users, that if they have had no harmful effects from cannabis
then other Class B substances will be equally safe. (P.12, para.
6.2, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, U.K., 2002)
The Council therefore recommends the reclassification
of all cannabis preparations to Class C under the Misuse of
Drugs Act 1971. (P.12, para. 6.3, Advisory Council on the Misuse
of Drugs, U.K., 2002)